Lemme see if I got this straight:
There was a guy who had a late night radio talk show. He was replaced by another guy. The audience members who couldn't stand the replacement started an online forum about how the replacement sucked. That online forum grew to discuss other stuff, including, largely, each other -- & largely how each other sucked. Meanwhile someone started a blogspot on the original subject.
Then they had podcasts to discuss that forum. Then they had a place in the forum to discuss those podcasts.
Then the original guy got another show. Then somebody from the forum & podcasts replaced him when he quit. Then the forum was about how she sucked.
Then the guy running the forum shut it down. So someone else from the forum took up a near-clone of it. Much of the discussion was about how the guy running the other forum sucked. Then the guy running the original forum started it up again. Meanwhile the blogspot still exists & takes comments on its last page (from 2007). And there's a podcast to discuss the near-clone forum too.
Now, on the near-clone forum, someone has started what's intended as a safe space, where nobody sucks?
Do I have all that right?
I don't know, I don't know.... Because it seems to me the only prominent guy who doesn't suck (yet) is the one who replaced the lady who sucked from the forum about how the replacement for the original guy sucked.