Author Topic: Fruit and Vegetable Labels  (Read 176621 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rikki Gins

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 13415
  • Alias Ben Chapman
Re: Fruit and Vegetable Labels
« Reply #345 on: January 27, 2019, 07:45:20 PM »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Rikki Gins

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 13415
  • Alias Ben Chapman
Re: Fruit and Vegetable Labels
« Reply #346 on: January 28, 2019, 01:56:55 PM »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Rikki Gins

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 13415
  • Alias Ben Chapman
Re: Fruit and Vegetable Labels
« Reply #347 on: January 29, 2019, 12:56:46 PM »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Company profile: https://www.bizapedia.com/ca/tapo-citrus-association.html
A 1941 court case involving Tapo Citrus Association: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1788741.html
Quote
Plaintiff Association contends that the language of said section 1200 of the Agricultural Code “is ambiguous or at least amphibolous”.

Rikki Gins

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 13415
  • Alias Ben Chapman

Rikki Gins

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 13415
  • Alias Ben Chapman
Re: Fruit and Vegetable Labels
« Reply #349 on: January 31, 2019, 05:53:46 PM »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


 

Bart Ell

  • Shithead
  • Ellevated
  • *****
  • Posts: 24824
Re: Fruit and Vegetable Labels
« Reply #350 on: February 01, 2019, 11:36:30 AM »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Not sure I get using a fish to advertise fruit.
IT SEEMS WRONG!

Rikki Gins

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 13415
  • Alias Ben Chapman
Re: Fruit and Vegetable Labels
« Reply #351 on: February 01, 2019, 01:43:02 PM »
Not sure I get using a fish to advertise fruit.
IT SEEMS WRONG!

I know.  We had another one early on in the thread: https://ellgab.com/index.php?topic=337.msg64380#msg64380

Rikki Gins

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 13415
  • Alias Ben Chapman
Re: Fruit and Vegetable Labels
« Reply #352 on: February 01, 2019, 02:21:59 PM »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

 

Rikki Gins

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 13415
  • Alias Ben Chapman
Re: Fruit and Vegetable Labels
« Reply #353 on: February 02, 2019, 01:53:23 PM »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Rikki Gins

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 13415
  • Alias Ben Chapman
Re: Fruit and Vegetable Labels
« Reply #354 on: February 03, 2019, 08:19:43 PM »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Rikki Gins

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 13415
  • Alias Ben Chapman
Re: Fruit and Vegetable Labels
« Reply #355 on: February 04, 2019, 02:10:32 PM »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Bankruptcy case involving Carlton Fruit Company: https://www.leagle.com/decision/198834086br2541277
Quote
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss Count I and Count II filed by State of Florida Department of Citrus be, and the same is hereby, granted and the claims set forth in the request to enforce the automatic stay and to impose sanctions for alleged violation of the automatic stay be, and the same is hereby, denied with prejudice.
  I love legal speak.  This was all one sentence.

Rikki Gins

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 13415
  • Alias Ben Chapman
Re: Fruit and Vegetable Labels
« Reply #356 on: February 05, 2019, 02:06:06 PM »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

http://www.andyboy.com/the-company/

Rikki Gins

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 13415
  • Alias Ben Chapman

Rikki Gins

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 13415
  • Alias Ben Chapman
Re: Fruit and Vegetable Labels
« Reply #358 on: February 07, 2019, 01:35:49 PM »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Rikki Gins

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 13415
  • Alias Ben Chapman
Re: Fruit and Vegetable Labels
« Reply #359 on: February 08, 2019, 08:10:50 PM »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

A 1937 court case (an appeal hearing) involving Corona Foothill Lemon Company over some water rights.: https://scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/corona-foothill-lemon-co-v-lillibridge-24891
Quote
The appellants, it is charged in the complaint, about the month of July, 1930, began pumping water in large quantities from wells situated on their lands also in the basin, which water they transported through an open ditch into the Santa Ana River and finally to points outside of the basin; that during the summer and fall of 1930 appellants so exported from the basin more than 500 miner's inches of water per day (the term "miner's inch" being used to specify 1/50th of a cubic foot of water per second), and sold such water for use on lands in Orange County, more than ten miles from the basin; that between October, 1930, and March 1931, appellants bored additional wells and enlarged their pumping plants and facilities for the purpose of increasing [8 Cal.2d 524] their exportation of water; and that about April 1, 1931, they resumed their exportation activities and transported from the basin large quantities of water, allegedly in excess of 800 miner's inches, continuous flow.
  (Another long sentence.)