Yes. Take AC/DC for instance. Some folks favor Bon Scott where others, Brian Johnson. For me it varies from song to song and not one singer over the other. @whoozit
Do you @Camazotz Automat have any opinion on this? I cannot imagine Bon singing For those About To Rock but that said I am not all that happy hearing Brian singing Whole Lotta Rosie ETC. I am not in the camp that one guy is better than the other. Shoot To Thrill or Shake A Leg (best riff ever) is unimaginable by any other vocalist on the planet - then and now.
But this I stand by; no better replacement for Bon than Brian.
@KSM Both Bon and Johnson ring true for me, depending on the song. Tonally, if I HAD to choose one over the other, I would choose Johnson, specifically during the
Back in Black/
For Those About To Rock periods.
But I would not in any way prefer Johnson to sing
Let There Be Rock et al. Bon permanently branded those songs with his unique sound. Similarly, I prefer Paul Di' Anno's punkish vocals on early Iron Maiden no matter how great Bruce sounds on later Maiden.
This isn't always the case. For example, I think Dio effectively covered early Sabbath.
The main thing - perhaps the KEY takeaway point - about my opinion, is I hate The Jonas Brothers like I'm a barking mad rabid bat.