EllGab - Spite Board

Rikki Gins Lounge => Movies and TV FISHatorium => Topic started by: timebandit on March 25, 2019, 05:06:16 PM

Title: Movie critique thread
Post by: timebandit on March 25, 2019, 05:06:16 PM
The Mule.. pfft.. dud.

watching US tonight..will return.
Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: KSM on March 25, 2019, 08:53:59 PM
The Mule.. pfft.. dud.

What about an actual CRITIQUE? When you start a thread like this you might consider kicking it off with some content. Good thread idea, but..  I have not yet watched The Mule but I'd like you to tell me why I may or may not be wasting my time. C'mon.. ;)
Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: timebandit on March 28, 2019, 07:59:13 PM
US.. not too shabby.. thumbs up

Mercy Black.. good, kept me entertained.
Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: timebandit on April 03, 2019, 05:33:47 PM
the OA was OK.. 1st season was better imo

Hanna... standard fair
Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: timebandit on April 04, 2019, 10:22:16 PM
Glass... left me shattered
I feel tattered.. pfft
Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: KSM on April 19, 2019, 12:22:14 AM
@timebandit

Where are the "critiques? Seriously, you have to provide content that supports your oh-so brief summaries. BTW I don't like your avatar, I don't like you, and if we were for some strange reason occupying the same immediate space? I would club you with a rather hefty piece of ham.

And another thing; I know you have a second account that you use to pad your karma score. Shame on you. SHAME!!

And another thing; if you have a problem with me I'll be tempted to utilize my BAN button.

This is your final warning


@Bart Ell Just keeping you in the administrative loop.
Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: Walks_At_Night on May 21, 2024, 09:36:31 AM
Watched "Demon Seed" [1977] last night. In seeing that it stars Fritz Weaver and Julie Christie I thought it would be worth a watch.  It was pretty wild. Starts out as a typical AI is bad computer film, with Weaver designing the Proteus IV computer. It rapidly devolves into microchips go wild when the computer locks Julie Christie in a house and begins to perform a bunch of experiments on her. At one point it shoves a needle into her temple to muck around with her brain. Some nerd shows up to check on Julie but the computer has built a sort of paper fortune teller thingy out of bronze [a truly impressive, pre-CGI effect] and chews the dudes head off with it.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


With the nerd out of the way, the computer then rapes Julie with its metallic whammer and impregnates her.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


She gives birth to this thing that sort of looks like a demonic Twiki from Buck Rogers but its metal casing sloughs off and it is a normal kid with a weird computer voice that says "I'm alive". Presumably not for long as I am sure someone will bash it in the head once it starts babbling about the computers plan which was to make it into some sort of F'd up Emperor of the Earth.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: KSM on May 21, 2024, 11:52:38 AM
Watched "Demon Seed" [1977] last night. In seeing that it stars Fritz Weaver and Julie Christie I thought it would be worth a watch.  It was pretty wild. Starts out as a typical AI is bad computer film, with Weaver designing the Proteus IV computer. It rapidly devolves into microchips go wild when the computer locks Julie Christie in a house and begins to perform a bunch of experiments on her. At one point it shoves a needle into her temple to muck around with her brain. Some nerd shows up to check on Julie but the computer has built a sort of paper fortune teller thingy out of bronze [a truly impressive, pre-CGI effect] and chews the dudes head off with it.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


With the nerd out of the way, the computer then rapes Julie with its metallic whammer and impregnates her.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


She gives birth to this thing that sort of looks like a demonic Twiki from Buck Rogers but its metal casing sloughs off and it is a normal kid with a weird computer voice that says "I'm alive". Presumably not for long as I am sure someone will bash it in the head once it starts babbling about the computers plan which was to make it into some sort of F'd up Emperor of the Earth.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


I remember seeing this VHS on the shelves but never picked it up or gave it any consideration. Huh..  maybe I'll have to try this one. The offspring does look pretty damn creepy.
Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: Up All Night on June 04, 2024, 11:27:40 AM
8.5/10

The Andromeda Strain

Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: Smokin Hot Bob on June 04, 2024, 07:58:42 PM
A good review from a passionate critic enough to make me think twice catching the latest in the Mad Max franchise.

Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: Smokin Hot Bob on June 08, 2024, 09:26:22 PM
Meanwhile ...

One old cuss against  a horde of Nazis. Hopeless odds. Makes John Wick look like a Sunday school teacher.

Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: KSM on June 16, 2024, 07:31:50 AM
Not bad at all.

i=uc6tQopyM6yE9Y8h
Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: Billy Joe Mulgreavey on June 16, 2024, 01:33:19 PM
Not bad at all.

i=uc6tQopyM6yE9Y8h

Very interesting and thought provoking, thanks for posting this.  In the end, I don't buy it.  If the alien can only assimilate the organic and cant assimilate anything artificial, it might rule Childs out.  Childs still has his gold tooth at the end of the film.  I suppose you could argue that the alien fabricated it somehow.  A really good film.
Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: Up All Night on June 23, 2024, 12:00:11 AM
Movie review: 'Horizon' a captivating Kevin Costner epic

https://www.upi.com/Entertainment_News/Movies/2024/06/23/Horizon-Kevin-Costner-movie-review/2501719119494/
Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: Walks_At_Night on June 27, 2024, 09:44:19 AM
Watched The Giant Claw [1957] recently. Standard 50's monster gone bad film of that time period. An engineer was up in northern Canada booming and zooming around in a jet fighter doing some experiments when he tangles with a giant thunderbird the size of a battleship. Things get unhinged from there and lots of guys that encounter the t-bird in aircraft are not so lucky and are killed by it. The engineer and his main squeeze attempt to fly south but are knocked down by creature. They survive and are helped by an apple jack swilling Quebecois whom is Mr. stereotype. Our heroes make it back to D.C. eventually and hook up with some air force brass and a nerd. The brass are frustrated that nothing they through at the creature works. After some study, the nerd [called Von Neumann - of course] discovers that the bird is sporting an anti-matter shield and is invincible. The bird then starts kicking some world wide ass and things are looking really glum. The engineer gets to work and after being pestered to eat and rest by the main squeeze, he invents a contraption to lower the birds shields on the sly. They dig out an old B-25 from mothballs for "maneuverability" with the brass flying it. The engineer, von Neumann and the squeeze climb aboard to and work the invention out of the tail guns of the old bomber. The shields are lowered and then the brass whip the Mitchell around and hammer the bird. It dies and the world is saved.


Guess that is more a summary then a critique.  Not and Oscar winner but I'm glad I watched it. The biggest disappointment was the bird itself - it looked a little strange (https://webelongdead.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/giant_claw_1.jpg).
Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: Rikki Gins on June 27, 2024, 10:05:31 AM
Watched The Giant Claw [1957] recently. Standard 50's monster gone bad film of that time period. An engineer was up in northern Canada booming and zooming around in a jet fighter doing some experiments when he tangles with a giant thunderbird the size of a battleship. Things get unhinged from there and lots of guys that encounter the t-bird in aircraft are not so lucky and are killed by it. The engineer and his main squeeze attempt to fly south but are knocked down by creature. They survive and are helped by an apple jack swilling Quebecois whom is Mr. stereotype. Our heroes make it back to D.C. eventually and hook up with some air force brass and a nerd. The brass are frustrated that nothing they through at the creature works. After some study, the nerd [called Von Neumann - of course] discovers that the bird is sporting an anti-matter shield and is invincible. The bird then starts kicking some world wide ass and things are looking really glum. The engineer gets to work and after being pestered to eat and rest by the main squeeze, he invents a contraption to lower the birds shields on the sly. They dig out an old B-25 from mothballs for "maneuverability" with the brass flying it. The engineer, von Neumann and the squeeze climb aboard to and work the invention out of the tail guns of the old bomber. The shields are lowered and then the brass whip the Mitchell around and hammer the bird. It dies and the world is saved.


Guess that is more a summary then a critique.  Not and Oscar winner but I'm glad I watched it. The biggest disappointment was the bird itself - it looked a little strange (https://webelongdead.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/giant_claw_1.jpg).

One goofy looking bird isn't it?  As a 1950's sci-fi-flic, I've seen it several times.  Interestingly, the principle stars, Jeff Morrow, Mara Corday and possibly Morris Ankrum and Robert (Inspector Henderson from The Adventures of Superman) Shayne, appeared at a premiere of the movie and none of them had seen the 'bird' up until then. When it made it's appearance the audience went crazy with laughter and gave it the raspberry, causing the actors to sink low into their seats and try to hatch a plan to get out of the theatre unnoticed.
Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: Walks_At_Night on June 27, 2024, 10:51:13 AM
One goofy looking bird isn't it?  As a 1950's sci-fi-flic, I've seen it several times.  Interestingly, the principle stars, Jeff Morrow, Mara Corday and possibly Morris Ankrum and Robert (Inspector Henderson from The Adventures of Superman) Shayne, appeared at a premiere of the movie and none of them had seen the 'bird' up until then. When it made it's appearance the audience went crazy with laughter and gave it the raspberry, causing the actors to sink low into their seats and try to hatch a plan to get out of the theatre unnoticed.


It sure is! Got a laugh from your story Rix. Guess the studio did the actors a dirty there.
Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: KSM on September 03, 2024, 10:32:44 PM
The latest M. Knight Shamalabugger movie (((TRAP))) is unfettered, unbridled, unapologetic BULL----SHIT!

As is usual he has a great idea and a great hook to get your attention, but also as is usual with him for the last 15 years he completely fucks it up in various ways. Great trailers are the big damn lie.

This movie, TRAP, plays the joke on you. Anyone who actually paid to see this thing in a theatre were the ones who were TRAPped!


fuck sakes  ::)
Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: Peter Wyngarde on September 11, 2024, 02:45:39 PM
I actually paid money to watch Beetlejuice Beetlejuice the other night. What an absolute bucket of bollocks that was! An hour and forty minutes of my life I won't get back. Barely a laugh in it. I ended up daydreaming about locking damon in a cupboard and inflicting all sorts of humiliations on him just to pass the time. I'm thinking of turning it into a movie, if you tight bastards would only stump up the ready. It's both moving and absolute filth at the same time.
Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: Walks_At_Night on September 11, 2024, 03:58:08 PM
I actually paid money to watch Beetlejuice Beetlejuice the other night. What an absolute bucket of bollocks that was! An hour and forty minutes of my life I won't get back. Barely a laugh in it. I ended up daydreaming about locking damon in a cupboard and inflicting all sorts of humiliations on him just to pass the time. I'm thinking of turning it into a movie, if you tight bastards would only stump up the ready. It's both moving and absolute filth at the same time.

Thanks for the heads up.  Honestly appreciated.  I suspected as much and was going to avoid it but nice to have confirmation.

Been trying to power my way through the Rings of Power which hasn't been a walk in the park but I'm in too deep now.
Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: Peter Wyngarde on September 11, 2024, 04:03:36 PM
Thanks for the heads up.  Honestly appreciated.  I suspected as much and was going to avoid it but nice to have confirmation.

Been trying to power my way through the Rings of Power which hasn't been a walk in the park but I'm in too deep now.

You're welcome. Not joking, it really was a waste of time, not worth paying money to see. They clearly had no idea of a story and just arsed about. Really disappointing, given how good the original was.

I saw Ian McKellen in a play a few months ago. I wasn't at the performance, but he fell off the stage in one and nearly killed himself. He claims he's still up to play Gandalf again though.
Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: KSM on September 11, 2024, 04:15:49 PM
I actually paid money to watch Beetlejuice Beetlejuice the other night. What an absolute bucket of bollocks that was! An hour and forty minutes of my life I won't get back. Barely a laugh in it. I ended up daydreaming about locking damon in a cupboard and inflicting all sorts of humiliations on him just to pass the time. I'm thinking of turning it into a movie, if you tight bastards would only stump up the ready. It's both moving and absolute filth at the same time.
Fortunately I had zero plans to see it and now you've solidified said non-existent plans.
Title: The Original Plans for Godfather 4 and the Franchise
Post by: Up All Night on September 13, 2024, 03:27:36 PM
Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: KSM on September 22, 2024, 10:04:43 AM
I watched the latest Nick Cage movie, LONGLEGS. He is very good in it; you don't see him behind his character. No facial features, no voice recognition, nothing! Somewhat creepy and very dreary movie. Nobody wins. Nobody feels good.

Solid 7 of 10

A complaint I do have is that nobody in the film actually had "long" "legs"! It's just fuckin' average legs!
Title: Re: Movie critique thread
Post by: KSM on December 05, 2024, 11:15:57 AM
The latest Clint Eastwood movie, Juror .2 is out online. It is a Clint made movie; he does not appear in it. He's made some great movies from behind the camera as you most likely know.

Juror #2 is "pretty good" - my quote. A solid 7.5 of 10. The ending may not be to your liking, however. That was my feeling.