any electrically conductive material can be used as a antenna. however the antenna length must be tuned to match the desired radio frequency.
Ding, Ding, Ding, - Give this man a cigar !
(Would you settle for a +1 instead ?)
Thanks for the excellent lead in.
Okay - pull out your calculator, let's figure this out.
For an example, we'll be using a laptop from - oh, I don't know, 2004. This example laptop might be a Toshiba, M-55 Satellite w/ a susceptible Pentium 4M (mobile) cpu running at 2.0 GHz (max cpu freq..)
This lappy is built from molded plastic - except for the back of the lid - which is aluminum. (No Faraday cage effect for the cpu.)
Wifi in 2004 (and still) operates in the 2.4 GHz range.
The first thing to know about antennas is:
There is an inverse relationship between frequency and wavelength: the lower the frequency, the longer the wavelength; the higher the frequency, the shorter the wavelength.
So how do you figure antenna length for one full wavelength of 2.4 GHz ? (This goes for any frequency you want an antenna length for.)
Divide the speed of light in meters, ((Damn Brits...
) ...which is the speed radio signals propagate at,) by the frequency.
c / f = one full wavelength for the target frequency - in meters.
Speed of light in meters: 299,792,458
Freq (cycles per second): 2.4 GHz = 2,400,000,000
Which comes out to: 0.124913524 meters,
or 12.491 Centimeters
Converting to inches, we get 4.9177165", approximately 4 and 59/64 inches.
That's just shy of 5" (actually, right between 4-7/8 and 4-15/16")
Think we can stuff that in a laptop ?
(Heh, heh, heh)
(I actually thought about tearing mine down again to get an accurate measurement on the heatpipe (the copper section) from the cpu to the cooling fins the fan blows through, but a picture will do.)
K000032240 TOSHIBA SATELLITE M55 HEATSINK SERIES "GRADE A"visitors can't see pics , please
register or
loginThe length of my cooling fins are approximately 2.4 inches.
That means that
if the heatpipe was used for an antenna, it would be right in the ballpark for 2.4 GHz.
As far as I'm concerned, yeah, it can easily be used as an antenna.
As far as cpu coolers in desktops ?
It's actually possible they could act like a YAGI antenna
Scope this out...
What we have here is known as a BiQuad wifi antenna, designed for 2.4 & 5 GHz (Hence the different sized plates.)
visitors can't see pics , please
register or
loginFrom:
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1096577862/the-biquad-yagi-antenna-for-wifi-and-fpvThey are right around the size of the larger CPU coolers like the MegaHalems.
visitors can't see pics , please
register or
loginGranted, these antennas have to be
precise in their measurements and spacing, so it's doubtful the coolers would work as antennas, but, most MoBos are mounted on the side panel of the desktop case, which would make a perfect YAGI antenna (for just one direction.)
usually antennas are designed to transmit/receive (well not so much transmit) a range of frequencies, such as fm radio, am radio, uhf tv , etc.
Yup, That's why if you wanted to build an AM loop to pick up the entire AM spectrum from 540 KHz to 1700 KHz (1.7 MHz,) you would shoot for the center frequency of 1120 KHz.
((1700 - 540) / 2) + 540 == 1120
Broadcast antennas are a whole different ballgame. You need to consider impedance matching, resistance, grounding, reduction baluns, antenna height, polarization, etc., etc., etc. .
c / f ==
299,792,458 / 1,120,000 == 267.67 meters
Convert.
878.18' is one full wavelength for 1120 KHz
Then make your antenna length 1/4 wave of 878.18'
or
219.5' ( or 219'6") - total length of wire for a 1/4 wave loop.
Gauge of the wire, spacings between turns, winding style (spiral, box, spider,) and size of the loop all make a difference in the nulling and distance of the stations you can pick up.
It's a fun project for DIY'ers, and there's plenty of info on the net .
furthermore tempest monitoring* may (further) drown out any transmissions from said heatsink.
How so ?
TEMPEST (a.k.a. Van Eck Phreaking) monitoring is generally passive reconnaissance. What I mean by that is; the target is not being zapped by any electro-magnetics the attacker is putting out. The attacker is reading and interpreting the the targets' electro-magnetic emminations.
This article explains it better than I can.
http://www.surasoft.com/articles/tempest.phpOh, and I really like this one - they apply TEMPEST mitigation to their website - LOL. (See if you can pick up on it.
)
https://www.hertzsystems.com/en/product/tempest-equipment/modern LCD screen have cut down significantly on tempest monitoring due to much lower power requirements...
Don't be getting slack on me, WR250. (Tisk,tisk.)
(Just kidding.)
The cables going to those LCDs and metal hinges in laptops make TEMPEST attacks still viable. It's still (as of 2007,) up to 75'
with the right target. Funny how there's no newer information on this in Public Domain. (I smell a R.A.T.)
http://web.archive.org/web/20180312095201/https://www.newscientist.com/blog/technology/2007/04/seeing-through-walls.htmlhttps://www.engadget.com/2007/04/21/laptops-and-flat-panels-also-vulnerable-to-van-eck-eavesdropping/Big D. even had his communications TEMPEST hardened.
https://electrospaces.blogspot.com/2017/11/trumps-communications-equipment-outside.htmlSo yeah, I have to disagree with you on these points.
It is kind of a specialist area. Anti TEMPEST, Van Eck, whatever you want to call it, technologies were actually being developed in the last days of WWII by the Army.
Here's some info on covert channels :
https://hackaday.com/2017/02/02/hacking-the-aether/And a good Sci-Fi book to read (if you haven't already,) is the Crytonomicon by Neal Stephenson.
https://archive.org/details/cryptonomicon00neal