Dietrich's "book" is worse than I expected:visitors can't see pics , please
register or
loginAs I have repeatedly stated, I expected they would present Dietrich's content using a work of fiction disguised as historical fact. The book offers few, if any, attributions to reliable or accessible (linked or paged books in or out of print) sources and is neither footnoted nor provides a bibliography of works cited.
Copyright © 2021 Douglas Dietrich and Peter Moon All rights reserved-
Published April 15, 2021"The characters and events portrayed in this book are fictitious. Any similarity to real persons, living or dead, is coincidental and not intended by the author. -
Clearly classifying the content of the book as FICTION!"No part of this book may be reproduced, or stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without express written permission of the publisher."Dietrich, Douglas; Moon, Peter. The Roswell Deception and the Demystification of World War II (p. 2). Sky Books. Kindle Edition.
The book was published to Amazon using Kindel and the publisher (Moon) setting an "export limit" of 15%. Meaning Kindel users who purchase the book are allowed to download 15% of its content.It is well known that Peter Moon essentially wrote the book after editing Dietrich's previously unreadable, illegible ranting screeds. And transcriptions of his shows excerpts and presentations. But Moon's rambling, repetitive and disorganized style of writing is apparent. The chapters are essentially brief but lack an organized structure that frequently dwells on unsubstantiated facts then reverts to the repetition of others, sometimes in connected paragraphs.
Most of the known unfounded and subsequently refuted claims by Dietrich about the Japanese and WW2 are included. But no attempt whatever was made to provide any further substantiation in the form of evidence. For example, the claims about the Perry flag displayed on the USS Missouri at the surrender ceremony, and the content of the Treaty of San Francisco, etc are not backed with convincing evidence. Rather, they are presented in the same argumentative and emphatic manner as Dietrich's shows and earlier presentations, with Moon (as the writer) offering his own obvious attitude of contempt for the established history.
Moon writes in his preface to the book:
"It is normal and routine for any reasonably well educated person in today’s world to believe that the Japanese lost World War II, unconditionally surrendering to the Allied Powers on September 2, 1945 in a signed ceremony aboard the U.S.S. Missouri. While there was indeed a ceremony on that date aboard the Missouri, nothing could be further than the truth about an unconditional surrender or a genuine surrender of any kind. The idea of an unconditional surrender or even a Japanese surrender is a myth that was very cleverly created by the Office of War Information..."Dietrich, Douglas; Moon, Peter. The Roswell Deception and the Demystification of World War II (p. 6). Sky Books. Kindle Edition.
Of course, Dietrich has his own "preface" of sorts as a disclaimer:
"I have been monitored by interested parties who perceive themselves to be threatened by what I expose. This includes being trolled extensively on the internet and having the telephone/cable box outside by home routinely doctored with different technology. These claims are well documented. If what I have to offer can just be laughed off as speculative hearsay, there would be no motive for the extent of monitoring and gang-stalking that is directed at me. What I offer to you here can be validated by doing your own research."
"In the end, you yourself and the other readers will serve as the collective jury, all of which will determine the relative impact this book will have on the world at large."
Dietrich, Douglas; Moon, Peter. The Roswell Deception and the Demystification of World War II (p. 17). Sky Books. Kindle Edition.
Although Dietrich still contends the Roswell Incident involved Japanese "aircraft" and "POWs" he has toned that down by describing the "alien" pilots as Japanese Yakuza - who were POWs.
In one example, I demonstrate how easily most of the claims made in the book can be refuted. Dietrich provided images of a Japanese man he claims was a surviving POW of the Roswell Crash, who was horribly disfigured after being tortured by his American captors.
From Chapter 35:
"Below is a Japanese prisoner of war who was tortured by the Americans. His extensive burns suggest he was an actual survivor from the Roswell crash.
Dietrich, Douglas; Moon, Peter. The Roswell Deception and the Demystification of World War II (p. 347). Sky Books. Kindle Edition.
visitors can't see pics , please
register or
loginThese images were taken from a Nov 2018 story published by David Puente
https://www.davidpuente.it/blog/2017/11/03/bufala-sopravvissuto-di-hiroshima-oggi-ha-127-anni-gli-scienziati-sotto-shock-le-radiazioni-lo-hanno-reso-immortale/ (Use Google translate)
On 29 October 2017, the website “We Are Left Alone” publishes an article entitled “ Hiroshima Survivor Today He is 127 years old. Scientists Shocked: "Radiation made him immortal" "exceeding 8,000 shares: Searching online for " Hitomi Tanaka " and Hiroshima we do not find any confirmation of the above story, rather the name is associated with a Japanese porn diva. Furthermore, there is no " Japan Scientific Research University ".
The man in the photos was called Tetsuo Sakurai (桜 井 哲夫), a Japanese poet suffering from leprosy ( Hansen's disease ) often quoted on the Leprosy.jp website and died in 2011 at the age of 87:
http://garando.jp/books/03/"Unfortunately, many websites continue to associate him as a victim of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. The photos date back to 2002 when he was a guest on a television program of the NHK TV channel".
This reference shows Tetsuo Sakuri (at age 17) as having been admitted to a sanitorium with Leprosy in October 1941,Tetsuo Sakurai Yearbook:
Born July 10, 1924 in Myodozaki, Tsuruta-cho, Kitatsugaru-gun, Aomori Prefecture
April 1931 Entered Myodozaki Branch School of Mizumoto Village Mizumoto Normal Elementary School
March 1939 Graduated from Mizumoto Village Mizumoto Normal Elementary School High School
October 1941 National Sanatorium Kurio Rakusenen Enrolled1953 Blindness
1983 Kurio Poetry Joined
1985 Catholic
November 1988 Poetry "Tsugaru no
Komoriuta" January 1991 Poetry "Kinyo"
May 1994 Poetry "Unrequited Flower" Excerpt ”
August 1996 Sanbunshu“ Blind King Story ”(collected“ Kuon no Hana ”etc.)
April 2000 Poetry Collection“ Thai Butterfly ”
Visit Busan, Korea from May 27, 2001 for 5 nights and 6 days
January 2002 Poetry collection "Unoie"
February 14, 2002 NHK Sogo TV Ningen Document> Appeared in "Into the Light of Tsugaru Hometown"
visitors can't see pics , please
register or
loginAnd Dietrich's claim that thousands of US Soldiers and Marines died after forced exposure to high levels of radiation during the occupation of Japan. He even offers this source
https://www.dtra.mil/Portals/61/Documents/NTPR/1-Fact_Sheets/NTPR_Hiroshima_Nagasaki.pdf which contradicts his own claims!
Personnel doses:
"Dose reconstructions are based on (1) residual radiation measurements, documented and published shortly after the bombings, (2) extensive review and analysis of the residual radioactivity in ensuing decades, (3) veteran activities, (4) the documented arrival and departure dates of each military unit which operated in the vicinity of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, (5) and potential fallout contact exposure. Doses received by veterans at Nagasaki were generally low; the approximate maximum external dose based on a presence for entire interval from September 16, 1945, to July 1, 1946, is 1.25 rem. Potential exposure to occupation troops assigned to Hiroshima was markedly lower due to radioactive decay prior to the delayed
October 6, 1945, entry into the city. External doses received by Kumamoto POWs for the interval from detonation on August 9, 1945, to a repatriation date of approximately September 23, 1945, is < 1 rem. Skin dose estimates for these POWs assume lack of sheltering and continuous contact with fallout contaminated surfaces since the POWs slept on the ground."The book also contains various (brief) references to Michael Aquino which Moon uses to set up his reference for another book concerning Dietrich and the Presidio. Of course, I expected this to be exactly what it is, but am a bit stunned to discover it is worse than I expected. Despite Barbarick's long history of writing and publishing, this "work" is poorly written and constructed and will not likely survive a higher level of scrutiny than my own.
