Refuting Douglas Dietrich

[Pelayo]

Ha, moonpie got in to this thinking he could knock out a few books and make himself a buck, only to run into a buzz saw of ddd haters that had the facts to shoot him down.

[Gunner65]

And it's early yet.  They have no clue the shit storm of scrutiny they will be getting.  This is incredible! 

Can you see how DD is working here?  He is starting on the Presidio book already, with Moon using the same tactic of transcribing his lies.

[Pelayo]

Hey moonpie, you should teach your  mail order bride how to say "do you want fries with that?" And you should learn the phrase as well.

[Gunner65]

"His worst nightmare"?  Really Vinny? Is that all you got?

Let's see how that goes after you spend 500,00.00 in legal fees, and the judge rules in my favor! Everything you say or do to me from now on will be recorded and presented as evidence. Who's the gangstalker now?  You dumb-ass mind-fucking asshole!

[Gunner65]

Vinny denies his book is a work of fiction!

WHEN THE COPYRIGHT PAGE SAYS IT IS!  OOOPS, probably too late to stop the printing press on that now.  And Dietrich had no clue?  BULLSHIT!

So Dietrich and Moon attack the consumer/reader for his own "mistake".  It is not a mistake.  Barbarick has done this before and knows he can get away with more crap by presenting it as fiction.  But he is so fucking lazy and stupid, he believes he can still get away with it 30 years later.

[Pelayo]

Hahaha moonpie, the japs surrendered completely. Any suggestion on your part otherwise would suggest you are an anti-American traitor and deserves to be stood against a wall. I know, I know, you are a loser and wants to make a living supporting a young wife who hates your old guts, so you stay with ddd. Another loser  whose only raison d'tre is racist hatred,

[Gunner65]

Dietrich's "interview" with Penny Bradley this Saturday at 5 pm is sure to be a classic.  Especially if he shows his face.  Now that we know for certain he has had no "medical cosmetologist" for years. And because people are waiting for it. lol


Dietrich interviewed by a person who has similar claims to Randy Cramer? The only reason Moon is promoting this interview is that she claims to have been involved with Montauk. 


But go ahead and attack me Vincent Barbarick for exposing your scam.  And if you pursue a copyright civil lawsuit, be prepared to lose everything you own. Because I will pound you to dust.

[Gunner65]

Peter Moon DENIED the book was a work of fiction LOL  And he LIED to Dietrich tonight when he stated the reviewer had lied when she pointed it out!  I would like to see how he gets out of that one!

When people on Amazon are pointing it out!  Does he believe Americans are stupid?

"OH, well, let's gang-stalk the negative reviewers by having Dietrich's cultists incite their friends to "report" them as terrorists"!  Or have Moon vaguely threaten them himself.. a real class act.  That way Dietrich can have his "Five-Star" review of their bullshit fiction book!

Fucking brilliant.

[Gunner65]

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

[Gunner65]

I believe a serious disagreement between Dietrich and Barbarick is inevitable.  Specifically about Barbaricks' lying to Dietrich and his followers that he never published the book as a work of fiction. "I didn't put that in the book" - Peter Moon

"Well you better talk to Amazon about that" - Dietrich

I believe Dietrich knows full well what "Moon" has done and that he is lying about it.  I am willing to bet, that there was no legal contract between the two regarding the specific issues of publication other than a verbal agreement of cooperation.  Because if they had signed a contract with the stipulation the books be works of non-fiction, Moon is now clearly in violation of it.

The book itself is so sloppy, that Dietrich should be (and is) a bit frustrated. But his fixation on having only 5-star reviews also reveals his intoleration of anyone challenging him, even if what they present refutes him with evidence. So in his typical maniacal way,  Dietrich uses the tactic of projection to incite his followers to actively gang-stalk his detractors and attack them.  A tactic that has previously failed, repeatedly.

Dietrich is obsessed with having any negative review of the book removed by reporting the reviews and reviewer profiles to Amazon in the belief they will be removed, and incites his followers to report them as "domestic terrorism."

Dietrich knows he has been deceived and that it is too late for any correction without creating a huge problem, with the print version already submitted, and the Kindel version already in print. Barbarick's lack of attention to the copyright as submitted also allows for purchasers of the Kindel version to download 15% of the content of the book. Thus negating any copyright lawsuit he might pursue in an attempt to intimidate or silence future detractors who will rip their pathetic "fictional historical revision" to fucking shreds.

Moon obviously has no knowledge of copyright law with regard to "fair use".  An example of this is his failure to attribute images he published in the book and his misguided belief that a work of fiction presented as non-fiction, cannot be disputed.

[Gunner65]

And to make matters more obscene, Dietrich's first "public intervew" following the release of the "book" is to be hosted by Penny Bradley (Sat. May 15, 5-7 pm EST) Which follows the Barbarick interview with Bradley where he ("Moon") clearly stated the book was "non-fiction".

By her own admission, Bradley has stated that Dietrich has been in private contact with her for several years. After her recent interview with "Moon", she has responded to several comments. 

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Dietrich is clearly attempting to "set up" his claim that he was personally responsible for investigating the Presidio child abuse scandal and was actively involved in it. Which will be the topic of his next "book" with Moon. This is intended to be the "centerpiece" of his trilogy of lies, in which he will elaborate on his imaginary relationship with Michael Aquino and proclaim himself a "DoD Research Librarian".  (whatever)

The truth is, he was a 16-year-old kid who served a summer job (1982) at the Presidio Post Library as a librarian's aid.  At a public, civilian library on a US Army Post with no basement, no incinerator, and no connection to Michael Aquino. Dietrich did so not as a military dependant, (because his father had retired before he was born in 1966) but as an ordinary civilian kid.

[Gunner65]

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

[Gunner65]

The YouTube channel Bradley will likely use to live stream this interview is called:   GLOBAL ENLIGHTENMENT RADIO NETWORK CHANNEL 2

[Gunner65]

Amazon book update:

Dietrich's cult followers continue to post "reviews" which might better be considered worship of Dietrich as being "God" and "The Truth".
https://www.amazon.com/Roswell-Deception-Demystification-World-War-ebook/product-reviews/B092MRWFF4/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_show_all_btm?ie=UTF8&reviewerType=all_reviews

Salmon Sheikh has posted more than once, using different aliases. "The Sufi Mystic", "Uncle Sal" and "Prince Amir".  Interesting that he is not shown as a "verified purchaser".  It should be obvious to anyone reading these reviews that Dietrich's cult monkeys are not posting anything close to a review, but are simply trying to counter any negative reviews in order for the book to receive a "five-star" rating.

Dietrich has incited his listeners to report any negative review as well as the profile of the person who submitted it.  It should be obvious to Amazon what is going on and that this violates their rules regarding posting reviews: https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=G3UA5WC5S5UUKB5G

We don't allow anyone to write reviews as a form of promotion.

The following are types of reviews that we don't allow and will remove:

A review by someone who has a direct or indirect financial interest in the product.
A review by someone perceived to have a close personal relationship with the product's owner, author, or artist.
A review by the product manufacturer, posing as an unbiased shopper.
Multiple negative reviews for the same product from one customer.
A review in exchange for monetary reward.
A review of a game in exchange for bonus in-game credits.
A negative review from a seller on a competitor's product.
A positive review from an artist on a peer's album in exchange for receiving a positive review from them.

[Walks_At_Night]

The YouTube channel Bradley will likely use to live stream this interview is called:   GLOBAL ENLIGHTENMENT RADIO NETWORK CHANNEL 2

5PM eastern?  Ooof. Kind of an inconvenient time. Would be interesting to see if the Night Witch boots him early or if she'll just let him run over her.