Author Topic: Refuting Douglas Dietrich  (Read 831328 times)

1 Member and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Pelayo

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 8647
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #2520 on: July 14, 2021, 08:10:14 PM »
ddd never lead any men in combat.

Pelayo

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 8647
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #2521 on: July 14, 2021, 08:55:37 PM »
Yeah lame-o, it's a pretty good idea to go see your psychiatrist. You sound pretty fucked up in the head.

Pelayo

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 8647
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #2522 on: July 14, 2021, 08:59:27 PM »
Make sure you guys give ddd a thumb's down!

Pelayo

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 8647
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #2523 on: July 14, 2021, 09:02:29 PM »
Sorry fat ass sandman, white women don't go for fudge packing brown pillsbury doughboys.

Gunner65

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 7267
  • Exposing The Lies & Insanity Of Douglas Dietrich
    • Exposing Douglas Dietrich
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #2524 on: July 15, 2021, 06:46:10 PM »
Interesting how Vinny and Dietrich's monkeys conspire to imagine a title for the next book -

Which will essentially be based on Dietrich's bullshit recountings of his brief summer "employment" at the Presidio Post Library as a 16-year old in 1982, but later became the basis for his outrageous claims of involvement with Michael Aquino in his presentation "Satan's Crusaders" in 2012.  During which he angrily accused the entire US Military of being Satanists, and left his audience with this slide:

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


                                                                 "The End"
                                            "EMBRACE DEFEAT AND GO IN PEACE"


But while tossing around ideas for a perspective title, Peter Moon reveals his true integrity:  (1:40:00)


"If you don't understand Douglas Dietrich and you don't give him ex-amount of attention, you're never gonna understand what happened there.  If you don't listen to his story, you'll never understand it because nobody has exposed it but Douglas.  Nobody's exposed the context, nobody was there who's told the story.  So if you don't grant Douglas at least a modicum of attention, let alone credence,  there's no way you can even begin to fathom it because it takes looking."      - Peter Moon (Vincent Barbarick)

In other words, if you listen to Dietrich and believe what he says without researching for yourself, you will "understand".  But if you research what Detrich claims for yourself, you will discover it is a complex series of lies that he has developed for a long time.  And makes no fucking sense.  And certainly will fall apart once subjected to more public scrutiny.




Gunner65

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 7267
  • Exposing The Lies & Insanity Of Douglas Dietrich
    • Exposing Douglas Dietrich
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #2525 on: July 15, 2021, 06:57:37 PM »
I predict it is possible that either Peter Moon or Douglas Dietrich will die before the publication of their next book.  Dietrich from his long-term drug abuse and Barbarick from age-related physical issues and stress. 

Neither have any integrity or social awareness beyond their own goals and I believe are certainly aware that what they are intentionally presenting as historical fact is actually fiction.  Barbarick will use his Fiction copyright as "plausible denial".

It just seems very bizarre to me that these two pathological liars would achieve their goals without enduring a more heavy public scrutiny.

Gunner65

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 7267
  • Exposing The Lies & Insanity Of Douglas Dietrich
    • Exposing Douglas Dietrich
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #2526 on: July 15, 2021, 07:28:28 PM »
Peter Moon, in my opinion, is using Dietrich in the same way he used Preston Nichols for his previous books about "The Montauk Project"...which was later exposed as being related to the "Philadelphia Experiment" and both an elaborate hoax that led to numerous "super-soldier" stories and related scams and will likely resume in a similar way with Dietrich.

A "new generation" of pathological liars who base their claims on the lies of Douglas Dietrich.


Gunner65

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 7267
  • Exposing The Lies & Insanity Of Douglas Dietrich
    • Exposing Douglas Dietrich
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #2527 on: July 15, 2021, 07:47:15 PM »
As for Salman Shiek:  He has a reputation for being an asshole in 2018-19 -

http://www.phoenixmasonry.org/salman_s_sheika_returns_to_freemasonry.htm

https://freemasoninformation.com/2018/11/masonic-anti-intellectualism-a-crying-shame/

Read the comments:  Salman accused his Masonic "brothers" of being racist and "Islamophobic" and left his Philadelphia lodge and association without providing evidence or giving names or allowing anyone to refute his accusations!  And then returned!

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

L-R: Bro. Salman S. Sheikh, GM S. Eugene Herritt and Bro. Mohammed AlJumaili

Gunner65

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 7267
  • Exposing The Lies & Insanity Of Douglas Dietrich
    • Exposing Douglas Dietrich
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #2528 on: July 15, 2021, 07:56:57 PM »
karey lakin says

FEBRUARY 27, 2019 AT 5:05 PM

PART 1: PLEASE PROVIDE AT LEAST ONE CONCRETE EXAMPLE OF MASONS EXPRESSING RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS BIGOTRY . IF NOTHING ELSE, GIVE US THEIR NAMES!

Salman, please provide at least one concrete example where another Mason (or Masons) displayed bigoted views regarding Islam, and people of your ethnicity. You alleged these Masons displayed these views via social media. Do you have a screenshot? Quotes? If not, tell us your recollection of what they said (that would at least be a start). Give us names too!

So far, you have provided no evidence of any kind. Offering the satement “x Masson expressed biggoted views” is not evidence that x Mason expressed bigotted views. It’s a circular argument.

These are serious allegations, and if true, may constitute unmasonic conduct. Specifically, defamatory/vile/indecent/profan/abusive/threatening language that causes material harm to a Mason or Masonry. Arguably (undoubtedly, in my mind), Masons publicly (through social media) expressing bigotted views against a particular religion, and against an entire race of people, causes material harm to Masonry (such behavior is antithetical to one of the most fundamental characteristics of Masonry, religious toleration). Racism is even worse. Especially in today’s environment, any Mason publicly expressing racist views harms Masonry as a whole because it indicates Masonry tolerates racism, especially if the offender isn’t held accountable.

In addition, the accused should have a chance to defend themselves (another principle we hold dear). Again, please give us names.

PART 2: YOU HAVEN’T PROVIDED PROOF BECAUSE YOU DON’T HAVE ANY.

My suspicion: you haven’t provided any factual evidence, or given any names, because you know you have a weak case. Probably, some Masons you know criticized some aspects of Islam they find distasteful, which offended you (understandable). You became resentful, and have decided to take it out on Masonry as a whole. You are here to sow

Why do I think this? If you you had solid proof, you would’ve presented it already.

Please prove me wrong. I will apologize on my knees if you show me clear proof of any of these brothers’ racism and religious bigotry. If you do this, I will fight for you the best I can to see justice done.

But until you do that, DON’T CALL ME BROTHER!

PART 3: WE ARE FREE TO DISCUSS/CRITIZE/BLASPHEME RELIGION IN OUR PRIVATE LIVES (SOCIAL MEDIA INCLUDED).

Social media has created a problem for Masons. It makes us more likely to see other Masons opinions on politics and religion, which are forbidden topics in lodge. Also, I’m assuming we are mostly polite enough not to criticize another Mason’s religion when fellowshipping outside of lodge.

Social media is public, but vis a vis Masonry, it’s part of our private life. I’m sure FDR offended many conservative and isolationist brothers via newspapers (and I’m sure we have plenty examples of famous Masons criticizing every religion there is). Social media today is the same as newspapers (unless it’s mason specific, like Fremasons Network).

We don’t have to walk on eggshells in our private lives, out of fear of being called a bigot for offering legitimate criticism. Such a state would constitute de fact anti blasphemy laws.

We certainly have no problem pointing out everything we dislike about Catholicism. The same standard should apply to all religions.

PART 4: I’M DISSAPPOINTED IN SOME MASONS’ UNCRITICAL ACCEPTANCE OF SALMAN’S ALLEGATIONS THAT MASON’S EXPRESSED BIGOTED AND RACIST VIEWS. (i.e. IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY FACTUAL EVIDENCE, AND WITHOUT GIVING ANY MASON ACCUSED OF WRONGDOING THE RIGHT TO EXPLAIN THEIR CONDUCT).

Some of you have been quite hasty to condemn some of YOUR ACTUAL BROTHERS (faceless so far) without hearing them out, and without knowing what they actually said. Please put your critical reasoning caps on. Salman may have a legitimate grievance, but hasn’t given us good enough reason to justify beliving he does. And in the absence of clear evidence, I would think as Mason’s, our presumption should be in favor of Mason’s and Masonry.

Gunner65

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 7267
  • Exposing The Lies & Insanity Of Douglas Dietrich
    • Exposing Douglas Dietrich
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #2529 on: July 15, 2021, 08:01:21 PM »
Solid evidence that Salman Sheik is a fake "SUFI MYSTIK" and a trained infiltrator. My guess is that he has infiltrated and is playing with the Dietrich "team" for his own benefit.  Because his affiliation with Dietrich and the aspects of falsehood and deception seem to betray his title as a Mason, Salmon presents himself "privately" as a Sufi Islamist Guru. 

The guy is steeping with fake "love and light" bullshit I hear from David Wilcock cultists...

Gunner65

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 7267
  • Exposing The Lies & Insanity Of Douglas Dietrich
    • Exposing Douglas Dietrich
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #2530 on: July 15, 2021, 08:16:29 PM »
I doubt that Salman will have any more influence on Dietrich than Brendan Zohget. And that both will disappear from his "narrative" in the near future.

Gunner65

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 7267
  • Exposing The Lies & Insanity Of Douglas Dietrich
    • Exposing Douglas Dietrich
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #2531 on: July 15, 2021, 08:36:52 PM »
Dietrich has invented a world of his own fantasies

Pelayo

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 8647
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #2532 on: July 16, 2021, 08:33:33 PM »
Once again ddd claims another famous person as a relation in an attempt to boost his authority, Lin Biao (last show 2:42:07). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lin_Biao    Quit yer lying ddd.   

Pelayo

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 8647
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #2533 on: July 16, 2021, 08:56:59 PM »
At about the 2:56:00 mark ddd boasts his "daddy" Hitler had killed enemy soldiers in WWI and knew war up close and personal. Sorry ddd, Hitler was a runner and had it comparatively easy as opposed to his mates as this article explains. https://historywench.com/2016/11/17/hitler-kills/  So, indeed ddd is very much like his imaginary father Hitler, he doesn't have the stomach to actually kill his enemies, he tries to talk his cult followers to do it for him.

Pelayo

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 8647
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #2534 on: July 17, 2021, 09:04:31 PM »
Go to around 4:13:20 and ddd talks shit about gunner and sucker fish face arola says that the time Gunner interviews Randy Cramer, he thinks Gunner is manufacturing the whole interview because RC sounds just like Gunner.