Ellgab flashback: May 2019May 12, 2019
The Lamentations of Douglas DietrichDietrich described his FaceBook page as a beautiful "personal treasure" and "zen garden shrine" to himself and his "familial ancestors" as being a "devastating loss". (Like the National Museum of Brazil). Caused of course by Michael Aquino, Steve Outtrim, and a group of three gang-stalkers. Dietrich is slowly realizing that the lies he has created over the past three years are falling apart yet he is still expecting them to somehow materialize into reality. He desperately attempts to convince Peter Moon and his cult followers to believe in allegations that are false and for which he cannot provide any evidence.
The likelihood of an investigation by the FBI or Canadian authorities into an "international terrorist" plot to murder his "daughter", "surrogate son" and himself resulting in the indictment of Michael Aquino as the source is more likely to implicate himself - and anyone with any brains at all knows this. Even Peter Moon was careful to point out that comments and posting of research results within the public domain are permitted whereas actual threats (with evidence provided) are not. Dietrich cannot provide evidence of any threats because they do not exist!
Yet Dietrich continues to state he is working with the FBI while stating that Aquino and Outtrim are "immune" to prosecution.
Dietrich claims that the entire world has now been denied his "cultural and artistic" influence.
The speculation between Dietrich and Moon is that Michael Aquino and Steve Outtrim will die - and the sooner the better. So now Douglas Dietrich is "forced to move on" (we have heard this before).
"And now my energies will go into a collaboration with Peter moon - and everything they feared will come to manifest" - Douglas Dietrich
Dietrich then says Ellgab.com is actually the "pedo porn" site rather than Bellgab.com (which he has attacked for two years). What a pathetic shit-show. And now Dietrich is placing his pathetic, useless lying personae in the hands of the opportunistic Peter Moon. Who has a reputation for writing fiction as fact!
Perhaps the book will begin with Moons' "Guide to the reader" disclaimer:
"Some of the data you will read in this book can be considered as 'soft facts'. Soft facts are not untrue, they are just not backed up by irrefutable documentation... This book is being presented as non-fiction as it contains no falsehoods to the best knowledge of the authors. However, it can also be read as pure science fiction if that is more suitable to the reader."https://www.reddit.com/r/StrangerThings/comments/6a234t/spoiler_so_i_started_reading_the_montauk_project/
