Author Topic: Refuting Douglas Dietrich  (Read 756274 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Gunner65

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 7237
  • Exposing The Lies & Insanity Of Douglas Dietrich
    • Exposing Douglas Dietrich
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #7575 on: June 01, 2022, 06:25:28 PM »
Moon has been through this before. when he was exposed as a fraud 30 years ago.  Remember Al Bleikick and the rest of those "Philadelphia Experiment" frauds?  Well. Vinny took that and created the "Montauk Project"  But it got exposed as a fraud too!

Pelayo

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 8620
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #7576 on: June 01, 2022, 06:27:19 PM »
Yeah, you have to give your shit book to the Romanians because they wouldn't pay for a bunch of lies.

Gunner65

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 7237
  • Exposing The Lies & Insanity Of Douglas Dietrich
    • Exposing Douglas Dietrich
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #7577 on: June 01, 2022, 06:29:05 PM »
Dietrich is his latest tool. He will use him as he did Preston Nichols.  Barbarick is a sick fucker. And so is Anderson.

Three sick fuckers....

Gunner65

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 7237
  • Exposing The Lies & Insanity Of Douglas Dietrich
    • Exposing Douglas Dietrich
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #7578 on: June 01, 2022, 06:33:53 PM »
Waiting for defamation and slander  - Where is ii?

Gunner65

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 7237
  • Exposing The Lies & Insanity Of Douglas Dietrich
    • Exposing Douglas Dietrich
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #7579 on: June 01, 2022, 06:35:58 PM »
Phil Corso...SRA

Pelayo

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 8620
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #7580 on: June 01, 2022, 06:37:08 PM »
Hey moonpie, it seems to me that Chi Gong would disapprove of lying con-men.

Gunner65

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 7237
  • Exposing The Lies & Insanity Of Douglas Dietrich
    • Exposing Douglas Dietrich
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #7581 on: June 01, 2022, 06:37:09 PM »
Al Beilick!  Jack Dermott

Gunner65

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 7237
  • Exposing The Lies & Insanity Of Douglas Dietrich
    • Exposing Douglas Dietrich
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #7582 on: June 01, 2022, 06:38:18 PM »
Moon is manipulating shit to cover his ass

Gunner65

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 7237
  • Exposing The Lies & Insanity Of Douglas Dietrich
    • Exposing Douglas Dietrich
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #7583 on: June 01, 2022, 06:41:14 PM »
Phil Schneider!  LOL!  Total BS  And he knows that it was bullshit!  See what Vinny is doing?  Al Bielick was a liar and the "Montauk Project" was a lie as well.

Pelayo

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 8620
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #7584 on: June 01, 2022, 06:53:22 PM »
moonpie cites Randy Cramer.

Pelayo

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 8620
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #7585 on: June 01, 2022, 07:01:12 PM »
Hey ddd, you hate the people who have lived in America for centuries because you are a no-load pile of shit invader who wants all the benefits of living here but contributing nothing in return.

Gunner65

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 7237
  • Exposing The Lies & Insanity Of Douglas Dietrich
    • Exposing Douglas Dietrich
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #7586 on: June 02, 2022, 12:30:28 PM »
During his last shit show (3:41:30 - 3:48:30) Douglas Dietrich falsely claims there are no records of DOD Civilian Employees who worked at the Presidio
https://rkcolejr.blogspot.com/2022/06/douglas-dietrich-falsely-claims-there.html

Douglas Dietrich claims that George Knight (a cult follower living in the UK):

"wrote to a record keeper with the Department of Defense (DOD) who said they maintained no records for the civilian workers who worked for the Department of Defense at the Presidio military base."

Knight has previously claimed he has "researched everything Douglas Dietrich has ever claimed and found it to be true."

No details were provided regarding the so-called response from the DOD.  Technically, the statement of the so-called "records keeper" (who was not named nor was a specific title or responding office given) is correct.

The Department of Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) maintains a database of all DOD employees (military and civilian).  They will verify the dates of active duty service of current and former service members, and the job title and dates of employment of current and former civilian employees.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


The DMDC does not maintain the actual official personnel records associated with military or civilian DOD employees. https://dwp.dmdc.osd.mil/dwp/app/main
The DOD does not maintain the records of former civilian employees separated after 1952. Dietrich was implying that there are no records of those who worked at the Presidio, including himself!  This is totally false.

Had Dietrich actually been a civilian employed by the DOD, he would know this.  He would also be aware that he could submit a request to the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) to obtain a copy of his own Official Personnel File for a small fee.

Any former DOD civilian employee who worked at the Presidio can do the same thing.


According to the National Archives: The Official Personnel Files (OPFs) of Federal employees including the Department of Defense are in the custody of the Office of Personnel Management for 120 days following separation, after which they are maintained by the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), St. Louis, MO.

"OPFs for former Federal civilian employees separated after 1951 remain in the legal custody of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). Access to such records is restricted under the Privacy Act of 1974 (P. L. 93-579) and only limited types of information from these records are releasable to non-authorized users under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Former Federal Civilian Employees (the person of record): may obtain copies of most civilian and personnel medical records on file at the NPRC, including copies of the Standard Form 50 (SF-50) (Personnel Action) via written request. Different release procedures apply for archival civilian personnel records (see OPF, Archival Holdings and Access). Please note: OPFs are retired to the center within 120 days after separation from Federal employment. If less than 120 days have elapsed since separation, write to the last employing Federal office."


https://www.defense.gov/Help-Center/Article/Article/2746440/separated-dod-civilian-employee-personnel-records/

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


https://www.archives.gov/personnel-records-center/civilian-non-archival

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Once again, Dietrich's idiot clowns step forward to defend him by attempting to discredit the evidence against him, while having no clue what they are talking about.

I challenge Douglas Dietrich to obtain those records and present them publicly, otherwise, he is lying about everything he claims about working at the Presidio


Gunner65

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 7237
  • Exposing The Lies & Insanity Of Douglas Dietrich
    • Exposing Douglas Dietrich
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #7587 on: June 02, 2022, 01:39:57 PM »
Other bullshit from that seven minutes:

- Moon admits they will be"Indulging in propaganda because it is the mechanism to get the message across".

-Dietrich is paying 500.00 a year for his "USMC Insurance policy- which is the only thing he has to prove he is a veteran"  (Was 250.00 per year)

- "Salman Sheikh is a pedophile and Jameson Reese is possessed by Michael Aquino".







Gunner65

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 7237
  • Exposing The Lies & Insanity Of Douglas Dietrich
    • Exposing Douglas Dietrich
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #7588 on: June 02, 2022, 02:01:20 PM »
Found this guy on YouTube:  This is how it's done. No bullshit, documents shown!


Gunner65

  • Ellevated
  • ******
  • Posts: 7237
  • Exposing The Lies & Insanity Of Douglas Dietrich
    • Exposing Douglas Dietrich
Re: Refuting Douglas Dietrich
« Reply #7589 on: June 03, 2022, 05:55:54 PM »
A brief review of "Vamphyrology: The Vampire Research Paper"
https://rkcolejr.blogspot.com/2022/06/a-brief-review-of-vamphyrology-vampire.html?spref=fb

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


The 3,628-word book is challenging to read, primarily because of Dietrich's misuse of Russian vocabulary and the confusing spelling of words and terms that he apparently created himself.

His comments throughout are often an annoying distraction from the "story" and despite a year-long effort by his "co-author" Peter Moon to edit the manuscript, the result is a work of obvious (and messy) fiction writing.

The book begins with an introduction but has only 2 "chapters." The subject is the existence and study of a sub-species of humanlike vampires by an obscure Russian physician and professor who lectured on the subject from 1969 to 1972 at the University of Kiev.

Dietrich claimed the lectures were of a "highly classified subject matter" involving the medical internment of a "human subspecies" at a remote arctic facility in Novaya Zemlya prior to and after 1969-72.

"Patient Zero", a "homo sapien primate" was incarcerated at the Leningrad Psychiatric Institute in September 1940 under the observation of Dr. Andreiev. The patient claimed to be at least 70 years old but appeared to be in his early 20s.

The Patient was later determined fit for military service during WW2 despite having been discovered "feeding off schizophrenic male patients in their sleep." Dr. Andreiev had discovered the patient was "high" and experiencing altered states of consciousness after ingesting other patients' blood.

"Patient Zero" later assaulted a female military nurse on the Eastern Front after being "forcefully conscripted" into the Soviet Army Special Services. But further references to "patient zero" do not appear in the book after.

The story suddenly turns to the use of similar "vampires" by the Russians against the Germans in Berlin during WW2. "Unnatural Units" attacked and killed innocent civilians and German soldiers alike as Russian "political officers" using dogs, searched for and located victims for the vampires.

The vampires were later executed with machine guns. Later, "Kirlian" cameras were used to track down, apprehend and kill the species in Russia after the war. A "covert special research and education facility was then created on Navaja Zemlya near Russkaja Gavan in 1966,

The remote Arctic facility housed a concentration of "Vamphyr Primates" in harsh weather with conditions of darkness for 6 months of the year. Despite this, many of the vampires were able to escape using flows of ice broken up by Soviet ships.

Russian Spetznaz then guarded the colony armed with AKs using "hollow-point silver slugs filled with crushed garlic". Dietrich claims that the vampires then escaped or avenged themselves by killing the soldiers who they considered an inferior species and referred to as "white N----s" accusing them of racism and "anti-vampire demicism."

The vampires were later able to secret themselves within the Russian population and emigrated to the United States as "displaced persons". Operating as an "unofficial fifth column," they later killed 14, 400 Americans per year.

But at the approximate 1,600 word count, the story devolves into a disjointed reciting of "military" history ranging from the 1700s to WW2 and the Cold War with an obvious anti-American sentiment.  At the 2,275 word point, the book suddenly begins to repeat large portions of previously written information from the introduction and descriptions of "Patient Zero."

It then returns to the tedious subject of "vampire science/biology" where Dietrich describes the female vampire:

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


It finally finishes with an abrupt ending where Dietrich accuses the professor of dehumanizing and abusing the captive vampires and likens him to Soviet Biologist Ilya Ivanovich Ivanov.

No mention was ever made of the fact that the remote arctic area of Novaya Zemlya had been used as a testing zone for Soviet nuclear weapons since 1954.

A revised version of my previous post about the book and the issue of the plagiarizing of the book's cover photo and the questionable origin of the material used as the basis for the book can be read here:


https://rkcolejr.blogspot.com/2020/11/blog-post.html