Here's AI's conclusion when asked if ddd is a liar: 4. Conclusion
Given the nature of Douglas Duane Dietrich’s claims and their reception within academic circles, there are substantial grounds for questioning their validity. However, without definitive proof of intentional deception in every case he presents, labeling him outright as a liar may oversimplify a complex situation involving belief systems and interpretations of history.
In summary: The determination of whether Douglas Duane Dietrich is a liar hinges on specific claims made by him and the context surrounding those claims; while many assertions lack credibility and are challenged by experts, proving intentional deceit consistently remains complex. So in essence, AI doesn't rule out the probability that ddd is just plain cray-cray.