@GravitySucks Any thoughts on this Artemis deal? Will we have people on the Moon in 2028 or is it going to be a goat screw?
I’ve been against this entire architecture since Bush announced the SLI. There were only about 16 SSMEs left after the shuttle program ended. So you design a completely different space launch vehicle using 4 SSMEs instead of 3 on the shuttle. Which means all types of software and hardware changes and completely new math models. Then you add a segment to the SRBs. More of the same. New launch crawler. New design of the hydrogen tank to now mount directly to the main engines. And you only have enough engines for 4 launches.
Then design a new space capsule and launch abort system and you have yet to define what the objective is for the system after Obama tried to cancel the whole thing but Congress put it back in the budget.
I started working on the systems engineering for the Orion capsule in 2006. I moved to a different assignment when Obama was trying to cancel it in 2008 or 9. I don’t know what the avionics/computing architecture ended up being but if it’s based on the 2007 requirements they are pretty antiquated and hopefully they at least have faster CPUs than we did then.
I worked 33 years in the space program after I got out of the Air Force. Orion was not my favorite assignment by a long shot. Lockheed Martin sure made a lot of money on it though.