2020 CoronaVirus Outbreak - That began in Wuhan, China and is spreading

[anniem]

You should have zero issue finding the names of all these Fifa plyers, right?
I await your list!

Why should he list, you won't believe it anyway.

[Bart Ell]

Why should he list, you won't believe it anyway.

You are right, I would have to look into it myself before believing it.
Like all those crazy links to French Government supported nonsense you were posting.

Let's review your logic -
The company that makes the squatter paste tells you it doesn't do what you want to pretend it does.
The McMaster University trial tells you it doesn't do what you want to pretend it does.
How dare Bart not believe it does what I want to pretend it does!
Yeah, my stubborness is the issue here.

[PB]

You are right, I would have to look into it myself before believing it.
Like all those crazy links to French Government supported nonsense you were posting.

Let's review your logic -
The company that makes the squatter paste tells you it doesn't do what you want to pretend it does.
The McMaster University trial tells you it doesn't do what you want to pretend it does.
How dare Bart not believe it does what I want to pretend it does!
Yeah, my stubborness is the issue here.

Once ''the science'' is politicized, it's no longer trustworthy.

When discussion of natural immunities and anything other than the vaccine - such as therapeutics - are censored, and any suggestion they may be beneficial is attacked, then we know we're being lied to and having information withheld from us.

Researchers, doctors, pharmaceutical companies get the hint and understand they'd better get on board - or else have the full weight of the federal government come down on them.

That's what's going on.  We have to ask why, and we have to get the information we need to stay safe from whatever source we can, and hope we can trust that.

It's really quite oppressive.  In addition to the rest of what's going on with the mandates that can also be described as oppressive.

[PB]

... The company that makes the squatter paste...

You do realize the Nobel Committee for Physiology or Medicine awarded their 2015 Nobel Prize to Ivermectin for fighting infectious diseases, right?  For humans.

That it is also beneficial to infections in horses, etc, is just a distraction intended to marginalize it and attack anyone suggesting we should look into the benefits.  If I give a horse an apple, is that now ''horse food''?

[Bart Ell]

Once ''the science'' is politicized, it's no longer trustworthy.

When discussion of natural immunities and anything other than the vaccine - such as therapeutics - are censored, and any suggestion they may be beneficial is attacked, then we know we're being lied to and having information withheld from us.

Researchers, doctors, pharmaceutical companies get the hint and understand they'd better get on board - or else have the full weight of the federal government come down on them.

That's what's going on.  We have to ask why, and we have to get the information we need to stay safe from whatever source we can, and hope we can trust that.

It's really quite oppressive.  In addition to the rest of what's going on with the mandates that can also be described as oppressive.

Yeah, I am sure that's the issue.
The whole world decided the Merck pill is bad but the Pfizer pill is good because... three armed monkies eating hot peppers instead of bananas in the middle of Wednesday afternoons.

[Bart Ell]

You do realize the Nobel Committee for Physiology or Medicine awarded their 2015 Nobel Prize to Ivermectin for fighting infectious diseases, right?  For humans.

That it is also beneficial to horses is just a distraction intended to marginalize it and attack anyone suggesting we should look into the benefits.

You do realize I said it is an antiparasitic wonder drug, right?
Just because you want to make a squirrel a rabbit doesn't mean you made a rabbit.

[PB]

Yeah, I am sure that's the issue.
The whole world decided the Merck pill is bad but the Pfizer pill is good because... three armed monkies eating hot peppers instead of bananas in the middle of Wednesday afternoons.

The people who ask questions aren't the problem.  Neither are the researchers and doctors (real doctors with actual patients, not bureaucrats with medical licenses) who have real life experience and concerns.  Neither are parents who know their kids are no threat to anyone and shouldn't be held out of school or be required to wear masks.  Neither are the 100 million or so people who have had it and now have natural immunities.

The people who are the problem are the censors, the bureaucrats and officials unconstitutionally issuing mandates that make no sense and don't follow ''the science''.  And the ''researchers'' who go along to get along.  And pharmaceutical companies that are going along in order to keep raking in the cash. 

Why the censorship?  Why ignore natural immunities?  Why the attacks on anything other than the vaccine and endless boosters?

[Bart Ell]

The people who ask questions aren't the problem.  Neither are the researchers and doctors (real doctors with actual patients, not bureaucrats with medical licenses) who have real life experience and concerns.  Neither are parents who know their kids are no threat to anyone and shouldn't be held out of school or be required to wear masks.  Neither are the 100 million or so people who have had it and now have natural immunities.

The people who are the problem are the censors, the bureaucrats and officials unconstitutionally issuing mandates that make no sense and don't follow ''the science''.  And the ''researchers'' who go along to get along.  And pharmaceutical companies that are going along in order to keep raking in the cash. 

Why the censorship?  Why ignore natural immunities?  Why the attacks on anything other than the vaccine and endless boosters?

It seems another fluffy cloud has come by and you are now shaking your fist at that and have forgotten the original fluffy cloud you were shaking your fist at.

[PB]

You do realize I said it is an antiparasitic wonder drug, right?
Just because you want to make a squirrel a rabbit doesn't mean you made a rabbit.

So it's not just ''horse paste''?

Lots of pharmaceuticals have off-label benefits.  I have no idea whether Ivermectin has benefits regarding covid, but plenty of others with personal experience believe it does.  It's fairly benign, what's the harm in taking it?  Why the alarmism and vicious attacks.

[PB]

It seems another fluffy cloud has come by and you are now shaking your fist at that and have forgotten the original fluffy cloud you were shaking your fist at.

If you say so

[Bart Ell]

So it's not just ''horse paste''?

Lots of pharmaceuticals have off-label benefits.  I have no idea whether Ivermectin has benefits regarding covid, but plenty of others with personal experience believe it does.  It's fairly benign, what's the harm in taking it?  Why the alarmism and vicious attacks.

No, it is also Squatter Paste.

So his name is not Schmo or whatever else you seem to constantly change the thread title to that I see on the main page all the time?
You mean you change it for effect? Shocking.

Fairly benign when someone needs something real is very harmful.
There is a member here who would tell you that... if you built a spirit box to contact him with.

[PB]

No, it is also Squatter Paste.

So his name is not Schmo or whatever else you seem to constantly change the thread title to that I see on the main page all the time?
You mean you change it for effect? Shocking.

Fairly benign when someone needs something real is very harmful.
There is a member here who would tell you that... if you built a spirit box to contact him with.

Yes, it's a dangerous deadly disease.  All the more reason to have input from those that have legitimate differing opinions and ideas.  All the more reason to answer questions instead of censoring them.  All the more reason to have an open environment where real research can be done, and not just catering to what will be approved by those who want a monopoly on information and opinions.

Why the censorship?  Why the one size fits all approach?  Why the stifling of anything other than vaccine and boosters?  We've known for a year and a half kids are far less susceptible to getting it or spreading it, yet that is ignored by the people controlling the schools.  We know people that have had it have natural immunities far superior to the vaccine, yet that is ignored.  Why?

We have to take everything Fauci says as gospel, while he reverses himself, moves the goal posts, and admits he's lied about certain things?  Is he really the only person in North America allowed to issue an opinion?  Why, he doesn't seem all that competent or trustworthy, to say the least? 

[anniem]

You are right, I would have to look into it myself before believing it.
Like all those crazy links to French Government supported nonsense you were posting.

Too many people just want to be spoonfed.

Let's review your logic -
The company that makes the squatter paste tells you it doesn't do what you want to pretend it does.

You must have me mixed up with someone else. I don't know anything about paste.

The McMaster University trial tells you it doesn't do what you want to pretend it does.
How dare Bart not believe it does what I want to pretend it does!
Yeah, my stubborness is the issue here.

Well, you are subborn, but I don't know anything about a McMaster University. I know some important things from direct experience, as opposed to hearing what my neighbor says. I'm fine.

[anniem]

Once ''the science'' is politicized, it's no longer trustworthy.

Or when "the science" is saying things that you know for a fact from over 30 years of direct experience is incorrect, completely wrong.

When discussion of natural immunities and anything other than the vaccine - such as therapeutics - are censored, and any suggestion they may be beneficial is attacked, then we know we're being lied to and having information withheld from us.

Researchers, doctors, pharmaceutical companies get the hint and understand they'd better get on board - or else have the full weight of the federal government come down on them.

That's what's going on.  We have to ask why, and we have to get the information we need to stay safe from whatever source we can, and hope we can trust that.

It's really quite oppressive.  In addition to the rest of what's going on with the mandates that can also be described as oppressive.

[Bart Ell]

Yes, it's a dangerous deadly disease.  All the more reason to have input from those that have legitimate differing opinions and ideas.  All the more reason to answer questions instead of censoring them.  All the more reason to have an open environment where real research can be done, and not just catering to what will be approved by those who want a monopoly on information and opinions.

Why the censorship?  Why the one size fits all approach?  Why the stifling of anything other than vaccine and boosters?  We've known for a year and a half kids are far less susceptible to getting it or spreading it, yet that is ignored by the people controlling the schools.  We know people that have had it have natural immunities far superior to the vaccine, yet that is ignored.  Why?

We have to take everything Fauci says as gospel, while he reverses himself, moves the goal posts, and admits he's lied about certain things?  Is he really the only person in North America allowed to issue an opinion?  Why, he doesn't seem all that competent or trustworthy, to say the least?

Found another cloud?