Imagine, the conspiracy lemmings and their masters in big pharma called this so-called “vaccine” as success. Of course they also believe a guy who’s only skill of shitting his pants makes a good President.
How many of these deaths could have been prevented by having a vaccine that actually vaccinated.
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/08/bbc-forgot-to-tell-you-4-in-5-covid-deaths-triple-vaccinated/
This is just like conspiracy theorists for assassinations or 911 troofers. The only way that they can make a point is to lie.
Here is what the UK Report says before it presents the data referenced by the website:
"These data should be considered in the context of the vaccination status of the population groups shown in the rest of this report. In the context of very high vaccine coverage in the population, even with a highly effective vaccine, it is expected that a large proportion of cases,
hospitalisations and deaths would occur in vaccinated individuals, simply because a larger proportion of the population are vaccinated than unvaccinated and no vaccine is 100% effective.
This is especially true because vaccination has been prioritised in individuals who are more susceptible or more at risk of severe disease. Individuals in risk groups may also be more at risk of hospitalisation or death
due to non-COVID-19 causes, and thus may be hospitalised or die with COVID-19 rather than from COVID-19.
The vaccination status of cases, inpatients and deaths should not be used to assess vaccine effectiveness because of differences in risk, behaviour and testing in the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations. The case rates in the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations are crude rates that do not take into account underlying statistical biases in the data. There are likely to be systematic differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated populations, for example:"
[various examples are given. you can read the text on page 34 of the Report, which can be found
here.
"These biases become more evident as more people are vaccinated and the differences between the vaccinated and unvaccinated population become systematically different in ways that are not accounted for without undertaken formal analysis of vaccine effectiveness. Vaccine effectiveness has been formally estimated from a number of different sources and is described on pages 5 to 15 in this report."
So there you have it. The Report recognized exactly what the "expose'" site says that was not told to you; explained it; and offered a section dedicated to presenting data that
properly analyzes the effectiveness of the vaccines against -- among other things -- mortality. It even presents qualitative statistical confidence information.
The website simply exploits the credulity of their audience. Does that sound at all familiar? It's what you clowns constantly claim that "Big Pharma" and "the Left" do. Will this bother you at all? No. Will you stop sucking that antivax penis? Also no.
It's like I said in a post to GravitySucks: every time you take a deep dive into the data presented by conspiracy retards, you always find something like this. It's a complete waste of time.
